ü New practical online course essential to any practicing or aspiring Propulsion Engineer
ü All students will receive an AIAA Certificate of Completion at the end of the course
OVERVIEW
Prediction
of remaining propellant for spacecraft in flight is critical in many cases,
from low orbit (like GEO ComSat, GPS, Earth Observation satellites, etc.) to
space exploration missions. Increases in demand for data flow capacity have led
to the development of larger and more powerful satellites. When such systems are utilized to full
capacity, the net annual revenues per vehicle may be in the millions of
dollars. Accurate knowledge of the propellant remaining is critical for the planning
and executing of space missions.
There are more than 300 GEO satellites now in flight. Knowledge of how much propellant remains is very important from different points of view: business planning, ordering new satellites, moving to a new orbital slot, etc. The phasing of orbital replacements on time in the telecommunications industry will maximize revenue and reduce the probability of occupying an orbital slot by a disabled satellite which has run out of propellant.
Currently, three methods of propellant estimation are commonly employed to evaluate remaining propellant for a spacecraft in flight:
· Book-keeping (BK) method, based on the calculation of used propellant
· Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT) method, based on the ideal gas law
· Thermal propellant gauging method, based on the measurement of heat capacity of the remaining propellant
Some of the methods, like the BK or PVT, have high accuracy at the beginning of a spacecraft mission. The high accuracy of these methods is either related to the fact that an error did not accumulate yet, like in the BK method, or due to high sensitivity of the helium (He) pressure to volume change at the beginning of life, as in the PVT method. On the other hand, some gauging methods like thermal which are not very accurate at the beginning of the mission life, become very accurate at the end of the mission life. This is due to the fact that the accuracy of thermal gauging methods increases as the propellant load decreases due to increase of temperature rise sensitivity to tank load when the tank load decreases
This new practical course covers all of the fundamentals of propellant gauging for chemical propulsion in the space environment. Electric Propulsion propellant gauging is also covered.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
- Understand all three propellant gauging methods
- Understand the pros and cons of each method
- Understand the optimal application of each method
- Understand propellant gauging for Electric Propulsion
- See detailed Outline below
CERTIFICATE:
COURSE FEES (Sign-In To Register):
- AIAA Member Price: $595 USD
- Non-Member Price: $795 USD
- AIAA Student Member Price: $395 USD
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OUTLINE
1. The most popular designs of a propulsion system
1.1. Chemical
1.1.1. Mono-propellant
1.1.2. By-propellant
1.1.3. Single tank
1.1.4. Multiple tanks
1.2. Electrical propulsion
2. Introduction to methods of satellite propellant gauging for chemical propulsion
2.1. Book-keeping
2.1.1. Fundamentals
2.1.2. Accuracy
2.1.3. Application of the method to different propulsion systems
2.2. Pressure-Volume-Temperature (PVT)
2.2.1. Fundamentals
2.2.2. Accuracy
2.2.3. Application of the method to different propulsion systems
2.3. Thermal propellant gauging
2.3.1. Fundamentals
2.3.2. accuracy
2.3.3. Application of the method to different propulsion systems
3. Comparison of all three methods
3.1. Which, when and how to use each method or combination
4. Propellant gauging for electrical propulsion
4.1. Fundamentals
4.2. Accuracy
4.3. Problems
5. Conclusion
Dr. Boris Yendler, CEO & Principal Consultant, YSPMM LLC, is an expert in thermal terrestrial and space applications. He has 30+ years of experience as a thermal engineer, developing methods for the thermal management of different systems including spacecraft platforms. He is CEO and founder of YSPM, LLC, a consulting engineering company that provides engineering services to satellite operators and manufacturers including propellant gauging, thermal and propulsion systems support, etc. Currently, Dr. Yendler is working on several space missions, including SmallSat Lunar IceCube (Morehead university and NASA), landing BereSheet (Israel) spacecraft on Moon surface, GEO communication SmallSat (Astranis), reliability of individual flying vehicle (Armada E), etc. Dr. Yendler has taught courses at different universities and military installations, including but not limited to Purdue University, Morehead University, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force base, etc. He previously worked as a thermal engineer at Lockheed Martin Corp. (LM) for almost 20 years.
Classroom hours / CEUs: 8 classroom hours / .8
CEU/PDH
Contact: Please contact Lisa Le or Customer Service if you have questions about the course or group discounts (for 5+ participants).
Title | Credit(s) | |
---|---|---|
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
5 | ||
6 |